On Tue, Sep 9, 2008 at 6:10 AM, Michael Stone <[EMAIL PROTECTED]> wrote: > > * We need to find out why the oom-killer is not killing things fast > enough. Based on our results, we might consider configuring > /proc/$pid/oom_adj to preferentially kill some processes (e.g., the > foreground [or background?] activities.)
Any reason why killing first activities' processes wouldn't solve the stability issue? AFAIK, we haven't seen OOM conditions without any activity open. Just in case, I'm not saying that isn't worth to do any of the other things on your list. Regards, Tomeu _______________________________________________ Devel mailing list Devel@lists.laptop.org http://lists.laptop.org/listinfo/devel
