On Tue, Sep 9, 2008 at 11:34 AM, <[EMAIL PROTECTED]> wrote: > On Tue, 2008-09-09 at 00:10 -0400, Michael Stone wrote: >> >> - This means that we need to measure how our memory consumption >> profile has changed since our previous releases. >> >> (cscott observes that we were unable to attack the F-9 image size >> issues until we were able to quantify the effect of changes we had >> made or were considering making. Consequently, he suggests that we >> will be unable to attack our current space consumption problems >> until we are able to generate good numbers (and displays).) > > what's the baseline "previous" release for this comparison?
update.1 (703, 708, 713 or your choice) You could also try using the "pre-F-9 merge" joyrides for comparison, but that presupposes that our memory problems are a side-effect of the F-9 merge, and I don't think that we have any evidence of this yet. --scott -- ( http://cscott.net/ ) _______________________________________________ Devel mailing list Devel@lists.laptop.org http://lists.laptop.org/listinfo/devel