On Fri, Sep 19, 2008 at 12:13 AM, Benjamin M. Schwartz <[EMAIL PROTECTED]> wrote: > -----BEGIN PGP SIGNED MESSAGE----- > Hash: SHA1 > > Marco Pesenti Gritti wrote: > | On Thu, Sep 18, 2008 at 11:34 PM, Benjamin M. Schwartz > | <[EMAIL PROTECTED]> wrote: > |> In summary, I believe we can safely move to a lightly patched Metacity > |> while tagging our windows purely according to the EWMH. > | > | That would mean to make Sugar impossible to use on a standard > distribution. > > You mean because it would make Sugar depend on a nonstandard branch of > Metacity? I can understand why distributions might be reluctant to carry > such a thing.
Yup. I will look into your proposal/discussion tomorrow. My brain is pretty much dead at the moment :) Marco _______________________________________________ Devel mailing list Devel@lists.laptop.org http://lists.laptop.org/listinfo/devel
