"Marco Pesenti Gritti" <[EMAIL PROTECTED]> writes: > On Mon, Oct 6, 2008 at 6:33 PM, Erik Garrison <[EMAIL PROTECTED]> wrote: >> In my mind the fundamental problem is that users aren't required to >> fully qualify names for their work. Doing so seems to lie outside of >> one of the core points of Sugar's design ("There are no files, folders, >> or applications." -- http://sugarlabs.org/go/Main_Page). Is it >> conceivable that we could change this feature of the system in future >> releases to clarify data management on Sugar-running XOs? > > You keep repeating this and it makes no sense. As Eben said we need to > encourage people to tag and name things. Saying that it's outside the > Sugar philosophy is nonsense.
I think we could have two modes: the one Sugar currently uses, where no specific name is required to store a journal entry, and one in which the user is required to name the journal entry when the activity is storing it for the first time. For example, in the first mode Atl-1 would do a screenshot as it does right now. In the second mode Alt-1 would bring up a window querying for the name of the screenshot. Whether users are encouraged or not to actually name and tags things on the XO can be influence by such UI features - no? -- Bastien _______________________________________________ Devel mailing list Devel@lists.laptop.org http://lists.laptop.org/listinfo/devel