chris wrote: > Hi, > > > I meant that we would ship a Sugar interface and a "standard" > > Fedora X-Window interface (e.g. XFCE) on the same NAND. I should > > have said "desktop environments" as Martin notes. > > Okay, I see, that sounds good. If we're comfortable with Xfce, it > sounds like we should resurrect Scott's work from about six months > ago on Xfce-and-Sugar in the "faster" builds.
is xfce the right choice? i know it's "easy", but we should be sure it's correct. (i've been using it on my own xo, in a relatively unsophisticated way, but in the end that only makes it feel like an unsophisticated interface, so i may not be the best judge. :-) paul =--------------------- paul fox, [EMAIL PROTECTED] give one laptop, get one laptop --- http://www.laptop.com/xo _______________________________________________ Devel mailing list Devel@lists.laptop.org http://lists.laptop.org/listinfo/devel
