Le samedi 20 décembre 2008 à 18:13 -0200, Martin Langhoff a écrit : > Hi Guillaume, > Hi Martin,
> Badlop has posted a new patch that I want to test. It conflicts with a > patch you've introduced to our build, > recent_online_and_rearby_groups_updated.diff -- two questions > > - Do we need this patch to interop with 8.2 correctly? What does it do? IIRC, this patch introduced new type of shared roster: @online@, @recent@ and @nea...@. Vanilla ejabberd only supports @a...@. > - Have you tested "vanilla" ejabberd for the bugs reported in EJAB-730/731? Yes. That's why I always mention @all@ instead of @online@ in the reports, but the problems were the same. > In the short term, I'm building an rpm to test here - with lop's > patch, and without yours. Have made any attempt at a merge - but can > try if you tell me it's needed. (Not that I know much erlang or > ejabberd internals, but getting there. Help welcome.) > I think if things are working fine with this patch using the @all@ shared roster, there is good chance that fixes @online@ as well. G. > cheers, > > > m > > ---------- Forwarded message ---------- > From: Martin Langhoff <martin.langh...@gmail.com> > Date: Sat, Dec 20, 2008 at 6:09 PM > Subject: Re: [ejabberd] Fix or workaround for EJAB-731 - shared roster > fails to show new user accts > To: ejabb...@jabber.ru > > > On Sat, Dec 20, 2008 at 11:20 AM, Martin Langhoff > <martin.langh...@gmail.com> wrote: > >>> - is there an altrnative workaround, something to force ejabberd to > >>> re-scan its list of users without a restart? > >> > >> Yes, check > >> https://support.process-one.net/browse/EJAB-731 > >> That new patch for ejabberd 2.0.2 fixes this and other problems > >> related to Shared Roster. There is a comment at the bottom of the page > >> with explanation of the changes. > >> > >> If you try the patch, please tell me if all seems to work correctly. > > > > Right - following that discussion, you are saying that the patch that > > fixed EJAB-71 should fix it, correct? But we are seeing the problem on > > I misread initially - thinking of the discussion in EJAB-730, that > points to EJAB-71. I've now seen the new patch and I've built a new > rpm with it. Will be testing tomorrow or Monday. > > cheers, > > > > m > -- > martin.langh...@gmail.com > mar...@laptop.org -- School Server Architect > - ask interesting questions > - don't get distracted with shiny stuff - working code first > - http://wiki.laptop.org/go/User:Martinlanghoff > > > _______________________________________________ Server-devel mailing list server-de...@lists.laptop.org http://lists.laptop.org/listinfo/server-devel