On Mon, Feb 2, 2009 at 9:26 PM, Gary C Martin <g...@garycmartin.com> wrote: > Happy to be proven wrong, and I guess it could be a Sugar feature not really > intended for XOs.
Let's let the flowers bloom: I don't doubt that there are many ways to make *better* collaboration, on an activity-by-activity basis. But VNC is something that can be created as a common baseline. Let's start by doing that, and improve it on a case-by-case basis, instead of having *no collaboration* as our baseline. FWIW, I second Carol's comments: VNC works quite nicely on fast local networks, such as direction connections between XOs, and I've used it on clients as simple as a Palm Pilot and a Mac SE/30. Reducing graphic busy-ness and palette size helps a lot! Also: don't run xvncviewer remotely: VNC is network efficient, but the way its X client uses the network between it and the X server is definitely *not*! --scott -- ( http://cscott.net/ ) _______________________________________________ Devel mailing list Devel@lists.laptop.org http://lists.laptop.org/listinfo/devel