On Thu, Feb 26, 2009 at 01:16:24AM -0800, Derek Zhou wrote: > On Thursday 26 February 2009 12:02:46 am James Cameron wrote: > > > > I'm not seeing what you're seeing. Perhaps there is something else > > affecting your system. > > > > Agreed. Now instead of a logfile which is different from computer to > computer, now I do a: > > time gunzip -c /usr/share/man/man1/perlfunc.1.gz > ( a nice long manpage, 7958 lines 357544 bytes )
The file /usr/share/man/man1/perlfunc.1.gz is from package perl-doc, version 5.10.0-19 in Debian Lenny. 04f8da39cd0d2c290f762d2a47c7bf2c /usr/share/man/man1/perlfunc.1.gz 357544 bytes 7958 lines Those numbers look the same, so we're working with identical test data now. Installed debxo 0.4 GNOME variant on jffs2. http://lunge.mit.edu/~dilinger/debxo-0.4/images/jffs2/gnome.{img,dat} ae9463081688155e550b99a7e87e01a8 gnome.dat 882748504c2800bf4e82cac33e5b7bfd gnome.img Installed rxvt and perl-doc. rxvt package version 1:2.6.4-14 Started rxvt -fn 12x24, left it size 80x24, tested using this file, results are: 4.818s, 4.494s, 4.490s. Maximised rxvt. Tested again, results are: 4.829s, 4.809s, 4.809s. This was without xorg.conf creation or changes. > So the non-drawing part cpu time on the olpc is tiny. Yes, my tests over wireless yield 0.131s, 0.134s, 0.138s. Tests to /dev/null yield 0.047s. > Something is wrong with my olpc in either the xserver or hardware. For > other non-drawing tasks its speed seems to be reasonable. Yes, something is wrong. Have you another XO you can test? -- James Cameron mailto:qu...@us.netrek.org http://quozl.netrek.org/ _______________________________________________ Devel mailing list Devel@lists.laptop.org http://lists.laptop.org/listinfo/devel