2009/3/2 Javier Cardona <jav...@cozybit.com>: > Agreed. However, I believe you can claim reliable WPA2 support, as > the WPA2 handshake doesn't have this timing vulnerability. > Have not tested extensively, but my experience was that WPA2 was very > reliable.
Yes, my experience is also that WPA2 is more reliable. However, don't forget that 8.2.1 introduces another regression which I can reproduce every time where the WPA2 (and WPA) connection is not automatically reestablished on reboot - association and WPA2 handshake succeeds, but the system receives no response during DHCP. (have not tested if the problem is in TX or RX path) http://lists.laptop.org/pipermail/devel/2009-February/022993.html This was also observed by Hal Murray and I can reproduce it on every boot. Daniel _______________________________________________ Devel mailing list Devel@lists.laptop.org http://lists.laptop.org/listinfo/devel
