Hi Victor, Thanks for the clarification. Yes, I was aware that csound in Fedora is 5.03. My query was based on getting Fedora up to the latest version (so if we needed olpcsound if fedora had >= 5.08). I'm going to follow this up to see where I can get. As a side note, do you know what the removed deps were?
Cheers, Peter On Wed, Mar 25, 2009 at 11:14 AM, <[email protected]> wrote: > Very strange, but olpcsound is based on csound 5.08. As far as I know there > is no > fedora package for csound 5.08 or 5.10. If there is, it should be no > problem moving from olpcsound to csound. I would not like to > move from olpcsound to csound 5.03, though. > olpcsound is not a fork, it is based on the same sources as Csound5, with > less components and dependencies. It is just a build option (for scons). > > Victor > ----- Original Message ----- > From: Peter Robinson <[email protected]> > Date: Wednesday, March 25, 2009 10:12 am > Subject: csound vs olpcsound > To: OLPC Developer's List <[email protected]> > >> Hi All, >> >> I know that olpcsound was originally a fork of csound for olpc. I >> noticed just now on the sugarlabs page for the 0.84 release [1] that >> it depends on csound 5.08/5.10 and makes no mention of >> olpcsound. Does >> that mean that olpcsound is now obsolete and that once we get csound >> in Fedora upgraded to a remotely recent version that olpcsound can >> just disappear? >> >> Cheers, >> Peter >> >> [1] http://wiki.sugarlabs.org/go/Development_Team/Sugar_Platform/0.84 >> _______________________________________________ >> Devel mailing list >> [email protected] >> http://lists.laptop.org/listinfo/devel > > Dr Victor Lazzarini, Senior Lecturer, Dept. of Music,National University of > Ireland, Maynooth > > _______________________________________________ Devel mailing list [email protected] http://lists.laptop.org/listinfo/devel
