>> From the Fedora perspective this is the latest beta release > > Is this statement meant to be equivalent to "this is the latest F11 > beta"?
Now I read it, a fairly pointless statement.... should have coffee _BEFORE_ replying to emails in the morning. >> It has all the latest Sugar stuff in it but >> has no specific XO fixes in it. EG it doesn't have the XO specific >> kernel patches in it which I assume SoaS does. > > Soas does not, nor does > http://dev.laptop.org/~cjb/rawhide-xo/f11-beta/ . I can't speak for > the intentions of either "distro"s in the future. > > Please recall Soas is targeted at more than XOs...I would assume that > the OLPC distro is more likely to include XO-specific bits than the > Soas distro. But now we're both assuming, rather than asking. > >> It would be great to get some testing done on it if possible to see >> what the issues are with it. I've been meaning on taking a look at >> SoaS to see what the differences are between that and rawhide but I >> just haven't had the time to do so yet. > > They're essentially the same right now apart from the choice of > desktop environment. Yea, it seems that its basically very similar. Peter _______________________________________________ Devel mailing list Devel@lists.laptop.org http://lists.laptop.org/listinfo/devel