Same here, I wrote a short article (mainly around Mitch's e-mail and my take of things) for olpcnews.
However due to scheduling constraints it will only be published next week. Christoph On Thu, Jul 23, 2009 at 12:54 AM, Bastien <[email protected]>wrote: > Bastien <[email protected]> writes: > > > Thanks *very much* for these explanations. > > > > I hope this kind of information can find its way through the OLPC blog, > > maybe with a little more context. Then we can fight the FUD by linking > > to these explanations. > > I've just written an entry about this on OLPC France's blog: > > > http://olpc-france.org/blog/2009/07/sugar-mauvaise-presse-et-mise-au-point/ > > Sorry, this is in french and I don't have time to translate it now. > But basically it tries to do this: > > 1. to clarify what is Sugar; > > 2. to explain what was the process of developing it for the XO, then for > any hardware -- this explanation giving hints on why (1) is sometimes > hard to understand and why NN comment needs clarification; > > 3. to tell (again) what is OLPC/Microsoft all about. > > I have pointed to some of the messages from this list. I hope this post > can help in getting rid of disinformation. > > Thanks, > > -- > Bastien > _______________________________________________ > Devel mailing list > [email protected] > http://lists.laptop.org/listinfo/devel > -- Christoph Derndorfer co-editor, olpcnews url: www.olpcnews.com e-mail: [email protected]
_______________________________________________ Devel mailing list [email protected] http://lists.laptop.org/listinfo/devel
