On Fri, Oct 16, 2009 at 17:52, Tomeu Vizoso <[email protected]> wrote: > On Fri, Oct 16, 2009 at 16:44, Mikus Grinbergs <[email protected]> wrote: >> Was able to use the XO-1.5 (os32) at another location, connected without a >> proxy. My opinion - this is a quite nice machine. >> >> The principal user-perception experience where improvement would still be >> welcome is video support. Changes to the screen (e.g., show/hide Frame) are >> not being done "smoothly". > > If there's no way in hand to further improve rendering performance, > then maybe using composition would be a possibility with the extra > memory we have?
And btw, if someone would like to spend some time seeing why rendering in Sugar is so slow, I can give some pointers. Also, except for icon rendering, it would also benefit rendering of GNOME windows. Regards, Tomeu > Regards, > > Tomeu > >> And when viewing "moving pictures", the >> currently scanty hardware acceleration (e.g., ticket #9407) is noticeable. >> >> For me, the XO-1.5 is a "performer" -- it runs many many Activities, plus >> applications ported from Linux. Interaction with the network works. I >> think that with this product the users' demands are met. >> >> mikus >> >> _______________________________________________ >> Fedora-olpc-list mailing list >> [email protected] >> https://www.redhat.com/mailman/listinfo/fedora-olpc-list >> > > > > -- > «Sugar Labs is anyone who participates in improving and using Sugar. > What Sugar Labs does is determined by the participants.» - David > Farning > -- «Sugar Labs is anyone who participates in improving and using Sugar. What Sugar Labs does is determined by the participants.» - David Farning _______________________________________________ Devel mailing list [email protected] http://lists.laptop.org/listinfo/devel
