On Thu, Oct 22, 2009 at 11:31, Martin Dengler <[email protected]> wrote: > On Thu, Oct 22, 2009 at 03:36:50PM +0545, Daniel Drake wrote: >> One of the biggest headaches we have to deal with, even >> when we have infrastructure networks, is the bug where every XO has a >> different set of neighbours on the neighbourhood view. Now we'd be >> making that bug a feature. > > Isn't this bug/feature an explicit goal of Gadget/Sugar: > > 1) >>> They'll see their friends, the result of the active searches and a >>> maximum of $N random buddies and $N' random activities > http://lists.sugarlabs.org/archive/sugar-devel/2008-June/006351.html
Well, this is only when you are staring at the neighborhood level and there's more results that we can represent. Then we limit with those heuristics and a hard limit. But it's not a goal of Sugar to limit the amount of people with whom can be collaborated, it's "just" that we miss a list view in the neighborhood zoom level. Regards, Tomeu > 2) jarabe/model/neighborhood.py line 39 & 40: > http://cgit.sugarlabs.org/sugar/mainline/tree/src/jarabe/model/neighborhood.py#n39 > > ...it's used around line 130, among others: > > http://cgit.sugarlabs.org/sugar/mainline/tree/src/jarabe/model/neighborhood.py#n130 > > > I've never liked that limitation, but I suspect I'm not understanding > something because it seems crazy to intentionally limit the results > that way. I'm glad I spent the 30 seconds to find the code so I can > hack it out :). > >> Daniel > > Martin > -- «Sugar Labs is anyone who participates in improving and using Sugar. What Sugar Labs does is determined by the participants.» - David Farning _______________________________________________ Devel mailing list [email protected] http://lists.laptop.org/listinfo/devel
