On Sat, Nov 21, 2009 at 11:23 AM, James Cameron <[email protected]> wrote: > On Sat, Nov 21, 2009 at 09:38:20AM +0100, Martin Langhoff wrote: >> 1 - tasks & bugs "going forward" -- filed mainly by the techteam and >> some dedicated volunteers that test our builds > > Yes, that's what I'm concentrating on.
That's cool... but not the only use of our trac. > >> 2 - bugs on released versions -- filed by volunteer testers _and by >> our end users_ >> >> We can't close the door on #2. Please do add the old releases back to >> the versions to report bugs against. > > No, sorry. The old releases were not present in full, only some of them > were, and there are far too many for this to be a realistic option. Hmmm. The list you added below does not correlate much with releases. I agree with removing things that are not formal releases, but 8.2 (756?) and 8.2.1 (802) _must_ be there. Otherwise it is impossible to do maintenance of stable releases. Also -- releases are not milestones. You'll want to add significant XO-1.5-osXX builds there (significant as in alphas, betas, RCs...). > I've added back a 1.0 Software version. We never had a "1.0 Software". We've had things like Update.1, .2 (756?) and 8.2.1 (802). Bottom line: what we need in the 'version' field is stuff that shows up in the Control Panel -> About my XO dialog. >> And I've reopened the 8.2.2 milestone, as I am using it. > > Yes, that's fine. Could you place a date and description on it so that > we can understand how you are using it? Will do. cheers, m -- [email protected] [email protected] -- School Server Architect - ask interesting questions - don't get distracted with shiny stuff - working code first - http://wiki.laptop.org/go/User:Martinlanghoff _______________________________________________ Devel mailing list [email protected] http://lists.laptop.org/listinfo/devel
