Btw, Record in Sugar works with the same symptoms as Cheese in Gnome
(that is, you can take pictures but you don't get a live feed).
Hth,
Raúl
On Tue, 2009-12-22 at 21:42 -0300, Raul Gutierrez Segales wrote:
> Hey guys,
>
> Is it cheating to change the screen depth? I change it to 24 bpp and now
> cheese and totem work. Changes to /etc/X11/xorg.conf:
>
> (in the Screen Section)
>
> DefaultDepth 24
>
> (in the Display SubSection)
>
> Depth 24
>
> Cheese doesn't show live video from the camera but I am able to take
> pictures. And totem reproduces video (no sound, but hey! that it is
> another thread/ticket).
>
> Anything wrong with using X with 24bpp?
>
> I can feel F11 on the XO-1 near.... :)
>
>
>
> On Mon, 2009-12-21 at 23:21 +0000, Tomeu Vizoso wrote:
> > Hmm, it's a bit hard to read with so many details, can you run it
> > again without -v --leak-check=full --show-reachable=yes ? Those are
> > useful when looking for memory leaks.
> >
> > I would expect that valgrind would complain when the uninitialized
> > values get read.
> >
> > Thanks,
> >
> > Tomeu
> >
> > On Mon, Dec 21, 2009 at 20:13, crodas <cro...@paraguayeduca.org> wrote:
> > > Hi there,
> > > On Sat, 19 Dec 2009 12:06:41 +0000, Tomeu Vizoso <to...@sugarlabs.org>
> > > wrote:
> > >> On Sat, Dec 19, 2009 at 07:00, John Gilmore <g...@toad.com> wrote:
> > >>>> #10 0xb67fae59 in gst_xvimagesink_xvimage_put (xvimagesink=0x8364160)
> > >>>> at xvimagesink.c:864
> > >>>> src = {x = 134867456, y = 140758336, w = -1259457208, h = 1}
> > >>>> dst = {x = 137730309, y = 3, w = 0, h = 137691184}
> > >>>> result = {x = 0, y = 0, w = 322, h = 241}
> > >>>> draw_border = 322
> > >>>> __PRETTY_FUNCTION__ = "gst_xvimagesink_xvimage_put"
> > >>>>
> > >>>> The src.w value is in the same range as the Xlib function addresses;
> > >>>> -1259457208 is 0x4B11CAB8 and as can be seen from the call frame #9
> > >>>> the XSync function is at 0x4b0eccf7. The other values seem
> > >>>> irrational. This may be evidence that the stack has been corrupted
> > >>>> somewhere else, or the values not initialised.
> > >>>
> > >>> Just to rule out going too far down a blind alley...
> > >>>
> > >>> Try adding a printf of these values to the code there, rather than or
> > >>> in addition to using GDB. GDB may not be 100% reliable when accessing
> > >>> variables from optimized code. (I used to maintain GDB, and I worked
> > >>> very hard to make it never lie to you, but that precept hasn't always
> > >>> been followed in the intervening decade, and optimizations have also
> > >>> gotten a lot more complicated.)
> > >>>
> > >>> Or try compiling that code without -O and see if that changes either
> > >>> its behavior, or what the debugger reports.
> > >>
> > >> At this point is when I would run totem in valgrind, I can help
> > >> interpreting the output if it's not clear.
> > >>
> > >> # yum install valgrind
> > >> $ valgrind totem
> > > I hope it helps,
> > >
> > > http://oficina.paraguayeduca.org/~crodas/valgrind-debug.txt
> > >
> > > cheers,
> > >
> > >>
> > >> Regards,
> > >>
> > >> Tomeu
> > >
> >
> >
> >
>
> _______________________________________________
> Devel mailing list
> Devel@lists.laptop.org
> http://lists.laptop.org/listinfo/devel
>
_______________________________________________
Devel mailing list
Devel@lists.laptop.org
http://lists.laptop.org/listinfo/devel
