On Dec 28, 2009, at 11:15 PM, Chris Ball wrote: > Hi, > >> While #9927 is personally interesting to me, can I instead divert >> your attention to the logs I just posted for #9865 ? > > Looks identical to the bug (#9702) with 3.3V not coming up fast enough > to successfully resume the internal SD card. We should check that > your C1 brings up the 3.3V rail quickly enough. > >> Tmw. I will be in a position to verify this bug on a largish >> number of C1 machines, and can hand off the poster child >> (prebuild #2) to someone else. >> >> I would blame hardware, but why does it only happen when OHMD is >> doing the suspending ? > > If we convince ourselves that it really does only happen with ohm, and > also only with rtcwake mixed with autowack, and doesn't happen on B2s > in the same configuration, we might find that we have #1835-like > problems when mixing autowack with an ohmd rtcwake immediately after > suspend hits -- we can get a resume happening below the EC's > autowack-delay in that case, which is known to cause problems. > > I suppose the answer in that case would be "don't do that". > Richard, what do you think?
Naw. I say we hunt it down and kill it. Probably a rail that needs a little help decaying. wad _______________________________________________ Devel mailing list [email protected] http://lists.laptop.org/listinfo/devel
