On Sat, 2010-01-09 at 04:03 -0600, Mikus Grinbergs wrote: > What I see the XOs doing is an "end run" around my concept of how remote > nodes are supposed to be accessed. I believe 'ping' is behaving the > standards-compliant way (192.168.1.0/24 does not access 169.254.0.0/16, > and vice versa). Whereas what shows up in the XO Neighborhood View (and > in 'olpc-xos') appears to ignore standards-compliance.
Surely all your machines can communicate quite happily using IPv6 link-local addresses? Why this fascination with Legacy IP? -- David Woodhouse Open Source Technology Centre [email protected] Intel Corporation _______________________________________________ Devel mailing list [email protected] http://lists.laptop.org/listinfo/devel
