On Thu, 2010-02-25 at 21:38 -0300, Bernie Innocenti wrote:
> On Thu, 2010-02-25 at 14:11 -0300, Bernie Innocenti wrote:
> > Feb 25 17:01:30 xo-37-38-0f NetworkManager: ******************* START
> > **********************************
> > Feb 25 17:01:30 xo-37-38-0f NetworkManager: Frame 0:
> > NetworkManager(nm_logging_backtrace+0x45) [0x8078da5]
> > Feb 25 17:01:30 xo-37-38-0f NetworkManager: Frame 1: NetworkManager
> > [0x8072f4d]
> > Feb 25 17:01:30 xo-37-38-0f NetworkManager: Frame 2: [0xb77c6400]
> > Feb 25 17:01:30 xo-37-38-0f NetworkManager: Frame 3: NetworkManager
> > [0x8067a5b]
> > Feb 25 17:01:30 xo-37-38-0f NetworkManager: Frame 4:
> > /lib/libgobject-2.0.so.0(g_cclosure_marshal_VOID__OBJECT+0x88) [0x93f338]
> > Feb 25 17:01:30 xo-37-38-0f NetworkManager: Frame 5:
> > /lib/libgobject-2.0.so.0(g_closure_invoke+0x1b2) [0x932352]
> > Feb 25 17:01:30 xo-37-38-0f NetworkManager: Frame 6:
> > /lib/libgobject-2.0.so.0 [0x947cf0]
> > Feb 25 17:01:30 xo-37-38-0f NetworkManager: Frame 7:
> > /lib/libgobject-2.0.so.0(g_signal_emit_valist+0x7bd) [0x94905d]
> > Feb 25 17:01:30 xo-37-38-0f NetworkManager: Frame 8:
> > /lib/libgobject-2.0.so.0(g_signal_emit+0x26) [0x9494e6]
> > Feb 25 17:01:30 xo-37-38-0f NetworkManager: Frame 9:
> > NetworkManager(_nm_marshal_VOID__STRING_STRING_POINTER_POINTER+0x9d)
> > [0x808ab1d]
> > Feb 25 17:01:30 xo-37-38-0f NetworkManager: Frame 10:
> > /lib/libgobject-2.0.so.0(g_closure_invoke+0x1b2) [0x932352]
> > Feb 25 17:01:30 xo-37-38-0f NetworkManager: Frame 11:
> > /lib/libgobject-2.0.so.0 [0x947cf0]
> > Feb 25 17:01:30 xo-37-38-0f NetworkManager: Frame 12:
> > /lib/libgobject-2.0.so.0(g_signal_emit_valist+0x7bd) [0x94905d]
> > Feb 25 17:01:30 xo-37-38-0f NetworkManager: Frame 13:
> > /lib/libgobject-2.0.so.0(g_signal_emit+0x26) [0x9494e6]
> > Feb 25 17:01:30 xo-37-38-0f NetworkManager: Frame 14: NetworkManager
> > [0x806df19]
> > Feb 25 17:01:30 xo-37-38-0f NetworkManager: Frame 15: /usr/lib/libhal.so.1
> > [0x71bc3e3]
> > Feb 25 17:01:30 xo-37-38-0f NetworkManager: Frame 16:
> > /lib/libdbus-1.so.3(dbus_connection_dispatch+0x36d) [0x703287d]
> > Feb 25 17:01:30 xo-37-38-0f NetworkManager: Frame 17:
> > /usr/lib/libdbus-glib-1.so.2 [0x71ca19d]
> > Feb 25 17:01:30 xo-37-38-0f NetworkManager: Frame 18:
> > /lib/libglib-2.0.so.0(g_main_context_dispatch+0x1f8) [0x852308]
> > Feb 25 17:01:30 xo-37-38-0f NetworkManager: Frame 19: /lib/libglib-2.0.so.0
> > [0x8559e0]
> > Feb 25 17:01:30 xo-37-38-0f NetworkManager: Frame 20:
> > /lib/libglib-2.0.so.0(g_main_loop_run+0x1bf) [0x855e4f]
> > Feb 25 17:01:30 xo-37-38-0f NetworkManager: Frame 21:
> > NetworkManager(main+0xe37) [0x8073d97]
> > Feb 25 17:01:30 xo-37-38-0f NetworkManager: Frame 22:
> > /lib/libc.so.6(__libc_start_main+0xe6) [0x673a86]
> > Feb 25 17:01:30 xo-37-38-0f NetworkManager: Frame 23: NetworkManager
> > [0x80570d1]
> > Feb 25 17:01:30 xo-37-38-0f NetworkManager: ******************* END
> > **********************************
> > Feb 25 17:02:14 xo-37-38-0f kernel: [ 3523.422953] psmouse serio1: detected
> > 37px jump in x
>
> Ok, I traced it down to ./src/nm-device-olpc-mesh.c:is_companion(), at
> the memcmp() line.
>
> their_addr is on the stack, so the invalid pointer must be priv. I can't
> debub further without rebuilding the rpm with -g. Any idea what might
> have gone wrong here?
>
>
> static gboolean
> is_companion (NMDeviceOlpcMesh *self, NMDevice *other)
> {
> NMDeviceOlpcMeshPrivate *priv = NM_DEVICE_OLPC_MESH_GET_PRIVATE
> (self);
> struct ether_addr their_addr;
>
> if (!NM_IS_DEVICE_WIFI (other))
> return FALSE;
>
> nm_device_wifi_get_address (NM_DEVICE_WIFI (other), &their_addr);
>
> if (memcmp (priv->hw_addr.ether_addr_octet,
> their_addr.ether_addr_octet, ETH_ALEN) != 0) {
> return FALSE;
> }
Hmm, doesn't ring a bell immediately. I pushed a fix for the driver
thing and am doing another NM build for F11. I'll try to take a look at
this after the new build goes through.
Dan
_______________________________________________
Devel mailing list
[email protected]
http://lists.laptop.org/listinfo/devel
