On Fri, 2010-03-26 at 01:10 -0700, Yioryos Asprobounitis wrote: > I really think that the Gnome desktop is a valuable addition for > the XO but mostly for the end user. Is not a coincidence that > people use it. So openness and robustness should be implemented > there too.
> If the problem is the video driver for example, this is what it > should be fixed, not hampering its use. You mean the blacked out GTK buttons and corrupt graphics in some web pages? We have a temporary workaround for these now! > I can see blocking as a temp measure but only in combination > with an increased gnome-bug-fixing priority. Sounds right, but I'm not sure *who* is going to put their time into it. My goal is to make Sugar rock, therefore I consciously chose not to let myself distracted by Gnome support issues. I told the "formadores" that bugs affecting Gnome are not going to be considered at this time. > Any user can mess-up its installation. Let's not forget that > the usual "fixing" for sugar is... reflashing. But here we are > talking bugs/inadequacies. Bug-fixing should be the way, instead > of blocking features and Sugar-robustness claims. I agree here too. -- // Bernie Innocenti - http://codewiz.org/ \X/ Sugar Labs - http://sugarlabs.org/ _______________________________________________ Devel mailing list [email protected] http://lists.laptop.org/listinfo/devel
