On Sat, Apr 10, 2010 at 11:40 AM, Yioryos Asprobounitis <[email protected]> wrote: > > > --- On Sat, 4/10/10, Bernie Innocenti <[email protected]> wrote: > >> From: Bernie Innocenti <[email protected]> >> Subject: Re: New XO-1.5 10.2.0 build 119 >> To: "Yioryos Asprobounitis" <[email protected]> >> Cc: "Fedora OLPC" <[email protected]>, "Chris Ball" >> <[email protected]>, "Devel" <[email protected]> >> Date: Saturday, April 10, 2010, 8:35 AM >> On Sat, 2010-04-10 at 01:47 -0700, >> Yioryos Asprobounitis wrote: > >> Repositories for end-of-life releases are just moved to >> permanent >> archives which are mirrored in fewer locations. For >> example: >> >> http://archive.kernel.org/fedora-archive/ > > Do you know of any place that has the Fedora 9 rpms? > People are looking for them to add new apps functions and hacks on Sugar-0.82 > machines but there are nowhere to be found. > If F9 repos were still available, F11 builds might not even be needed for the > XO-1. > The same thing will happen to XO-1.5 by the time that F11 builds will get > deployment status. > I would assume that deployments need a LTS release or a seamless upgrade. > They can not go by the 6-month release cycle. > So mirroring a snapshot of the latest F11 repos before taken down will be > important for the immediate future, till moving to F13-F14 or whatever is > decided.
Has there been any discussion on whether CentOS was an option as a base for the distro? With RHEL/CentOS 6 hopefully within sight, that would give a nice target to provide both the combination of stability and long term support. -Jon _______________________________________________ Devel mailing list [email protected] http://lists.laptop.org/listinfo/devel
