Doubtless it would be painful... but... openjdk _is_ open source.
Jython? On Fri, May 28, 2010 at 11:21 AM, [email protected] <[email protected]>wrote: > You are correct. Android development is Java based. It is based on a > subset of Java functionality with the android API built on top of that. > > If you want a QT based environment look at Meego > http://meego.com/developers. > > > On May 28, 2010, at 7:20 AM, Peter Robinson wrote: > > > On Fri, May 28, 2010 at 1:10 PM, Walter Bender <[email protected]> > wrote: > >> Putting some kittens at risk, it would be useful to have some analysis > of > >> both the work involved and potential benefits to an Android port, a Qt > port, > >> etc. I am not suggesting we divert our current efforts, as we are quite > >> lean, but a better understanding of these options would be useful in > >> defining our future roadmaps. > > > > Isn't Android application development Java based? > > > > Peter > > _______________________________________________ > > Devel mailing list > > [email protected] > > http://lists.laptop.org/listinfo/devel > > > _______________________________________________ > Devel mailing list > [email protected] > http://lists.laptop.org/listinfo/devel >
_______________________________________________ Devel mailing list [email protected] http://lists.laptop.org/listinfo/devel
