On 26 May 2010 06:16, Peter Robinson <pbrobin...@gmail.com> wrote: > On Tue, May 25, 2010 at 5:25 PM, Bernie Innocenti <ber...@codewiz.org> > wrote: > > Hello everyone, > > > > we've just started a new development cycle aimed at providing Sugar 0.88 > > for the XO-1. Our focus is stability and usability for deployments, > > although we're also attempting to merge a couple of low-risk features > > developed in Uruguay. > > > > Full details are here: > > > > http://wiki.sugarlabs.org/go/Deployment_Team/Sugar-0.88_Notes >
> Is F-11 still the base OS for this? > > Peter > > Just for my knowledge, does Fedora have an equivalent to Ubuntu's long-term support releases? Without thinking too deeply about the implications, it make sense (to me) to peg XO development to something that's stable over a few years. That way package versions etc will be widely known and consistent. /me reads [1]. Apparently not. Is there anyway to achieve something similar without needing to pay for RHEL, which is probably a bit of an overkill? Best regards, Tim McNamara @timClicks [1] http://news.cnet.com/Long-term-Fedora-Linux-support-ending/2100-7344_3-6146604.html
_______________________________________________ Devel mailing list Devel@lists.laptop.org http://lists.laptop.org/listinfo/devel