On Mon, Jun 07, 2010 at 11:54:45PM +0200, Sebastian Dziallas wrote: > at today's SoaS meeting [1], we agreed on applying the SoaS Activity > Inclusion Criteria [2] as outlined in the wiki [...]
You've decided to apply as policy a draft document which describes itself as not reflecting policy. Suggestion: remove the draft status, approve the document, and remove section 2.11 (template text) to the discussion page. > to the activity selection for the upcoming release of SoaS v.4. We'd > like to encourage you to work towards meeting these goals and to > submit your proposals for activities and further features following > the feature process [3] according to the release schedule [4]. I've looked through the process. It is discouraging and complex. I suggest that people other than activity developers be encouraged to run through the process on behalf of discouraged or absent activity developers. > We're especially lead to this step to ensure to continued stability of > future Sugar on a Stick releases [...] It isn't clear to me how this process will increase or ensure stability of the Sugar on a Stick releases. Which particular meaning of stability are you using; a lack of change, or a lack of reported defects? -- James Cameron http://quozl.linux.org.au/ _______________________________________________ Devel mailing list [email protected] http://lists.laptop.org/listinfo/devel
