> Use of iperf on a local network can be easily reproduced, however. I'm sorry - what I am interested in is how quickly I can download a new build to the XO with my existing setup -- I am NOT interested in how well a special-purpose tool (iperf) performs on my existing LAN.
Anyway - running iperf with an XO-1 as the iperf server: My throughput numbers are 1/10 (or even less) of Quozl's. [Even though the ethernet switch(es) on my LAN are advertised as 100Mb, I've never gotten high throughput rates on that LAN.] By the end of a period of testing, the throughput to the XO-1.5 client was only 3% slower than the throughput to the XO-1 client. The 'top' values for (wa) and (hi) were zero for the iperf clients. The only difference was the (sy) value - 6% for the XO-1.5 client, 2% for the XO-1 client. mikus _______________________________________________ Devel mailing list [email protected] http://lists.laptop.org/listinfo/devel
