On 7 Aug 2010, at 21:08, Tiago Marques <tiago...@gmail.com> wrote: > Just killing a random activity is a terrible idea becayse you don't want your > product behaving like it's defective; the pop up idea is way more > acceptable(and a lot better than having the system randomly behaving like > it's crashed). Either way, this is the extremely important use of swap memory > that doesn't exist here. I understand your engineering constraints on the > hardware but randomly killing activities is poised to confuse users and cause > people considering the hardware for deployment to think that you're selling > them something defective/baddly manufactured.
As long as activities are saving and restoring properly it could be made pretty much transparent to the user. Of course that's easier said then done... Marco _______________________________________________ Devel mailing list Devel@lists.laptop.org http://lists.laptop.org/listinfo/devel
