On Thu, Dec 30, 2010 at 8:44 PM, Bernie Innocenti <[email protected]> wrote: > On Thu, 2010-12-30 at 20:10 +0000, Peter Robinson wrote: >> On Thu, Dec 30, 2010 at 5:12 PM, Bernie Innocenti <[email protected]> wrote: >> > On Thu, 2010-12-30 at 09:27 -0500, Martin Langhoff wrote: >> >> AIUI, from discussions with Simon and Tomeu that's not the case. Gnome >> >> people are not that insane, the old APIs will still work and be >> >> supported. >> >> >> >> They won't be the latest coolest API wiz-bang so support may be >> >> weaker, and/or we may get "ah, well, the bug you mention is fixed in >> >> the introspection API, migrate to that" instead of a fix to the >> >> problem you report. >> >> >> >> Personally, I don't mind *not* being in the bleeding edge for one cycle >> >> :-) >> > >> > I agree with you. There's no hurry to switch to GNOME 3 and there are >> > higher priority tasks at this time. >> >> So are we saying that we don't want sugar on a stick for the F-15 >> release cycle and are happy to have it dropped from the Fedora Spins >> and someone else is prepared do the work to get it back to that >> status? Or do people generally not care about SoaS? > > Is Fedora already dropping all the gnome2 libraries?? > I can't believe this.
Nope. But they're all compiled against gtk3 and things will be changed in pygtk / gobject-introspection as mentioned which will likely affect sugar. Peter _______________________________________________ Devel mailing list [email protected] http://lists.laptop.org/listinfo/devel
