On Thu, Feb 24, 2011 at 1:36 PM, Paul Fox <[email protected]> wrote: > i'll cut to the chase and say that i'm completely confused by what's > happened, or not happened, and by what you've done to make it better. > in other words, it's probably all fine. ;-)
Ok. So for the F11 series, you and Sayamindu worked on the 'keyboard-data' repo. It had some issues... - It has an "initial import" that wasn't upstream's pristine 1.5 -- it was 1.5 plus several patches (the patches Fedora rpms were applying at that exact time, plus some of ours... but not all). So I studied the delta between pristine and our "import" to trace all changes. It paid off -- there was a one line change that wasn't in any patch, and I think it'd have bitten us. - That repo also has dropped some patches that were present (and of value) the F9 rpm. Notably the 'olpc2 for es' patch that is discussed @ http://dev.laptop.org/ticket/9126 . Same with the patch for http://dev.laptop.org/ticket/5060 . I don't know if this was intentional. I've re-merged the #9126 patch. I strongly suspect that #5060 is addressed in a different way now. Were these patches removed for a good reason? Perhaps you can remember... > what i don't understand from your messages so far re: keyboards is, > what exactly is wrong? which keys, on which keyboards, for which > languages, don't work? So we discovered that olpc-utils has a code block for #9126, which triggers, but there is no es / olpc2 definition. > > all at http://dev.laptop.org/git/users/martin/xkeyboard-config > > when i try and clone this repo, it seems to work fine until the very > end, then says: Sorry - fixed now. thanks! m -- [email protected] [email protected] -- Software Architect - OLPC - ask interesting questions - don't get distracted with shiny stuff - working code first - http://wiki.laptop.org/go/User:Martinlanghoff _______________________________________________ Devel mailing list [email protected] http://lists.laptop.org/listinfo/devel
