On 02/28/2011 02:37 PM, Martin Langhoff wrote:
> Hi Daniel,
>
> to ensure we keep track (and limit) of what non-Fedora rpms make it to
> the builds, should the "rpm collection" step... ?
>
> - only grab rpms that say .olpc
> - complain about rpms that don't...
>
> This would mean that in the package listing, it's non-ambiguous what
> packages we're "carrying".
>
> cheers,
>
>
> m
What would be the preferred place to put 'olpc' in the rpm name? Between
the distribution version and the 'arch'? Like:
Version: 0.92.0
Release: 1%{?dist}.olpc
sugar-0.92.0-1.fc14.olpc.noarch.rpm
And another check could be to make sure there is a srpm available for
each package.
Regards,
Simon
_______________________________________________
Devel mailing list
Devel@lists.laptop.org
http://lists.laptop.org/listinfo/devel
