On Sun, 2011-04-17 at 11:19 -0400, Kevin Gordon wrote: > Martin and the Gang: > > Since last we spoke, I've been working on this new issue I'd > mentioned, where when I try to run a bash shell script resident on a > USB drive inserted into an OS16 OLPC, I always get "Permission > Denied". But now, I'm not sure it's a "bug"; and if so, I'm now > pretty sure it isn't an OLPC bug. > > Here are the details to reproduce. Go to terminal on a 10.1.3 Build > 860, or any build before. Log in as root (su -) Write a little > script - it can be a one liner, "echo Hello World" is good enough. > Save it as test.sh to a USB stick which has been formatted FAT32 and > has a volume name FEDORA. Do a "Chmod +x /media/FEDORA/test.sh". One > can then take that USB stick to any previous-to-Fedora 14 OLPC, and > execute the script by simply installing the drive, logging into root > (su -), going to the terminal prompt, and entering > "/media/FEDORA/test.sh", and see the old 'Hello World' come up - not > "Permission Denied". One can also tab complete through that command, > and it sees and auto-completes the test.sh portion too, > > So, I tried on a vanilla little lenovo with a fresh unaltered > installation of the Fedora14 Live-Desktop. The script runs fine from > the USB drive. Then after accepting and installing the 422 recommened > Software Updates on the box, this box too now gives "Permission > Denied". I repeated this same procedure twice more with fresh > installs, then updates. Very consistent,, works before updates, does > not work after. > > On the OLPC side, I did a more binary search, and the script continues > to work right up to and including os5 from the 11.2 builds. At os6, > and after, is where the Permission Denied starts to occur when > attempting to execute. Not surprisingly, and concurrently, the tab > complete capability on the "test.sh" portion ceases to function at > this point as well. > > Alas, someone upstream might now consider this a feature, not a bug. > Also, someone upstream might be able to figure out which of those 422 > packages is responsible, if they should care to.
Partial diff between os5.packages.txt os6.packages.txt -udisks-1.0.1-4.fc14.i686 +udisks-1.0.2-2.fc14.i686 Jerry _______________________________________________ Devel mailing list Devel@lists.laptop.org http://lists.laptop.org/listinfo/devel
