> on the sources of activity should be placed in the file version > activity.info activity that is designed so that other users who want > toexperience can see the compatibility of the activity in different flavors > :-)
I believe that is not necessary. __ALL__ the software files in this package are written in Python -- so anyone who unzips the package has access to all the source code. [There are some data files in binary format - but I don't expect you to try to reverse-engineer those.] > the question is where build of sugar was tested this activity? Since the event.block() problem occurred from a file in the olpcgames subdirectory -- it is likely that the activity's author picked up that ENTIRE subdirectory from a now superseded version of Sugar. I do not know HOW SugarLabs does version control of the resources made available to Activity authors - but I am unaware of such information being packaged within the released Activity's bundle itself. mikus _______________________________________________ Devel mailing list [email protected] http://lists.laptop.org/listinfo/devel
