On 26 April 2011 23:13, John Gilmore <[email protected]> wrote: >> I think all of those are safe assumptions to make, and that FIEMAP is >> the more correct and efficient way of doing this. > > Here's a reason not to: FIEMAP doesn't actually work yet (or, alternatively, > since its behavior is undocumented, you can't depend on its behavior):
It looks like a lot of those issues are resolved with the latest discussions and churn in the kernel community, but perhaps it is a good idea to avoid FIEMAP for now while everything settles. I still think its the right approach but perhaps better saved for a future release cycle. James, is the latest firmware release good to go with images created in this manner? Daniel _______________________________________________ Devel mailing list [email protected] http://lists.laptop.org/listinfo/devel
