On 17 May 2011 20:58, John Gilmore <[email protected]> wrote: >> > Any objections to prelink being disabled? > > I object.
Thanks John and James for the detailed comments and investigation. I've spent some time looking at this. I've sent a patch to prelink upstream allowing us to install a fixed timestamp, but I'm still waiting to see what they say. I have also tried a post-processing approach to tweak that timestamp to a fixed value, and a LD_PRELOAD hack, without success. My experiences are detailed here: http://dev.laptop.org/ticket/10898 Can either of you help, especially with the prelink_timestamp_remover approach? What am I doing wrong with libelf? Thanks, Daniel _______________________________________________ Devel mailing list [email protected] http://lists.laptop.org/listinfo/devel
