On Wed, Jul 27, 2011 at 12:21 PM, Martin Langhoff <[email protected]> wrote:
> From Jon Nettleton's notes on the xorg track, it is clear that we need > Linux 3.0 as it includes CMA support (at least enough bits of it that > Jon can get his job done). > > So cjb tackled an initial rebase of our patches to the 3.0, skipping > the RPM spec/build bits. Now I've reviewed his rebase -- really hard > to tell as several patches have been squashed together, so I it > sorta-kinda-makes sense, but it'd need a replay of the whole exercise > to tell. > > I have also re-imported the rpm and makefile bits, so `make ARCH=arm > xo_1_75-kernel-rpm` works. > > The resulting kernel builds, boots, reboots, drives the camera, audio > output, reads accelerometer, battery, keyboard, tp, runs runin, and > generally seems to make sense. > > I didn't try any of the new Linux 3.0 features -- Kinect support anyone? > :-) > > git repo at http://dev.laptop.org/git/olpc-3.0 > > rpms at http://dev.laptop.org/~martin/public_rpms/f13-arm-olpc/?C=M;O=D > > I know in Fedora 16 there were a number of tools that didn't play well with the 3.0 (likely not a complete problem as I think the final release was in fact 3.0.0) and the > 2.6 numbering schemes. I don't remember which ones, I seem to remember mdadm (obv not a problem) but don't remember what else but be aware if things randomly break which previously worked that it could be due to verrsioning of the kernel. Peter
_______________________________________________ Devel mailing list [email protected] http://lists.laptop.org/listinfo/devel
