On Wed, Aug 31, 2011 at 12:06 PM, Daniel Drake <[email protected]> wrote: >> My main concern is that 1.75 is gonna see more churn than x86... > > Can you elaborate?
Ahm, ofw/kernel and xorg are moving, and as soon as we have important ofw/kernel/xorg chunks landing I _will_ want to trigger a build, and I'll personally pester everyone on this list to upgrade and provide feedback. A week-long feedback cycle for those items is murder given the short time we have between now and Nov 1st... (On the slower-moving x86 side, I agree, there isn't such pressure...) >>> With a fully functioning koji and complete-ish repos >> >> You mean we can use our koji setup for stuff not in Fedora? Or does >> that qualify for "exceptional"? ;-) > > That qualifies for exceptional. Just like XO-1 and XO-1.5. I'm so exceptional! >>> This brings us nice symmetry: >>> XO-1 uses f14 and f14-xo1 >>> XO-1.5 uses f14 and f14-xo1.5 >>> XO-1.75 uses f14 and f14-xo1.75 >>> And in each of the f14-xo* repos, the only packages present are kernel >>> and bootfw. >> >> OK - so I better rename my "f14-arm" to f14 and be done with it ;-) > > Right now the f14-arm dropbox (in general, not specifically yours) > includes stuff like csound and powerd that should not be carried over > (those will come from koji). And runin is already in f14 as noarch for > XO-1.5. But yes, you get the idea. I think we're saying the same thing ;-) m -- [email protected] [email protected] -- Software Architect - OLPC - ask interesting questions - don't get distracted with shiny stuff - working code first - http://wiki.laptop.org/go/User:Martinlanghoff _______________________________________________ Devel mailing list [email protected] http://lists.laptop.org/listinfo/devel
