martin wrote: > On Thu, Oct 20, 2011 at 2:03 PM, Paul Fox <[email protected]> wrote: > > i'm not too worried that we can't do better with what's coming along. > > Is it worth making noise about olpc-powerd, lessons learned, desirable > features? > > We are ahead of the curve in using mostly-vanilla Linux with > aggressive suspend strategies, so others might not have the experience > and burn-marks we carry...
the problems that i know we have -- how to inhibit suspend properly, how to avoid race conditions when suspending or resuming, are well-known problems that android's wakelocks and the new kernel infrastructure are aimed at addressing. so i'm confident that we'll have better tools to solve those problems than we do now. but i do need to read that thread more carefully. paul > > > m > -- > [email protected] > [email protected] -- Software Architect - OLPC > - ask interesting questions > - don't get distracted with shiny stuff - working code first > - http://wiki.laptop.org/go/User:Martinlanghoff =--------------------- paul fox, [email protected] _______________________________________________ Devel mailing list [email protected] http://lists.laptop.org/listinfo/devel
