On 02.11.2011, at 13:59, Sascha Silbe wrote: > Excerpts from C. Scott Ananian's message of 2011-11-02 05:58:42 +0100: > >> A pure-CPU benchmark (maybe something in Pippy?) would be a little >> more reliable. > > === Begin facspeed.py === > #!/usr/bin/env python > import time > > def factorial(n): > result = 1 > while n > 1: > result *= n > n -= 1 > return result > > n = 100000 > start_time = time.time() > factorial(n) > time_diff = time.time() - start_time > > print '%d! computed in %.3fs' % (n, time_diff) > === End facspeed.py === > > > System SoC/CPU OS + arch time > XO-1.75 Armada 610 @ 0.8GHz Debian armel 199.108s > XO-1.5 VIA C7-M @ 1GHz Debian i386 199.285s > OpenRD 88F6281 @ 1.2GHz Debian armel 181.277s > Desktop PC Athlon BE-2300 @ 1.9GHz Debian amd64 34.180s > > > I must admit I'm surprised by the result. sup (my MUA of choice) feels > much slower on XO-1.75 than on XO-1.5 - and that's even though dstat > reports higher SD card write throughput (with a different card). Maybe I > should do some side-by-side comparisons.
According to "0 tinyBenchmarks" in Squeak Etoys (which estimates bytecodes/sec and message sends/sec), the 1.75 is about 10% faster than the 1.5. Both were running os883. - Bert - _______________________________________________ Devel mailing list [email protected] http://lists.laptop.org/listinfo/devel
