On 01/11/2012 05:21 PM, [email protected] wrote: > it is presumed that replacing XULRunner > 1.9.1.9 should not cause problems in browser functionaltiy.
That's an extremely dangerous thing to presume. I "presume" that you're actually going to test the browser extensively after performing the upgrade to ensure that the upgrade doesn't break the browser. > Are there > any other dependencies that we should concern ourselves with(assuming > that it is not against OLPC policies to perform the upgrade)? The other activities that use Xulrunner (e.g. Wikipedia) are all very similar to Browse, so the upgrade is unlikely to cause problems in one but not another. As for dependencies of the browser, you should check that you have not caused a regression in plugin support, especially as relates to the Totem and Gnash plugins. --Ben
signature.asc
Description: OpenPGP digital signature
_______________________________________________ Devel mailing list [email protected] http://lists.laptop.org/listinfo/devel
