On Thu, Mar 15, 2012 at 9:26 AM, Martin Langhoff <martin.langh...@gmail.com> wrote: >> This won't provide uniqueness between 12.1.0 build 3 and 12.2.0 build >> 3, for example, but I don't think we are shooting for perfection in >> terms of conflict avoidance, right? > > Hmmm. Maybe we can "shift our window" a bit, and drop the decade to > pick up the major release. > > So 12.1.x ==> 21, and 12.2 ==> 22
One imperfection raised here is for point releases. We have been inconsistent in the past with what we do for development builds of point releases - sometimes we have reset to 1, in other cases we have incremented over the development build number of the previous cycle. For 12.1.1 would you reset to build 1 (causing a potential-but-harmless name conflict), or would you continue on from the last build number of 12.1.0? Daniel _______________________________________________ Devel mailing list Devel@lists.laptop.org http://lists.laptop.org/listinfo/devel