On Sun, Mar 18, 2012 at 10:20:26PM -0400, Martin Langhoff wrote: > > On Mar 16, 2012 11:03 PM, "James Cameron" <[email protected]> wrote: > > Attached is a revised patch, which places the resize: before > > zblocks-end: with a wrapper to prevent warning. This allows the resize: > > request to be added to olpc-os-builder without requiring OpenFirmware > > support. > > This completely nukes our ability to run fs-verify after fs-update. > > In the mystery mgf/qa bug we are chasing right now, the ability to run > fs-verify is something... I wouldn't want to lose so quick. > > Am I understanding this correctly, that you're injecting this in the .zd file > so it runs unconditionally? Can we make it optional (even if it defaults to > yes)? So that "fs-update noresize u:\os666.zd" wil DWIM?
I think you may have misunderstood. The patch to OpenFirmware adds fs-update-no-resize, which does not completely nuke our ability to run fs-verify. Please also read the previous message http://lists.laptop.org/pipermail/devel/2012-March/034532.html -- James Cameron http://quozl.linux.org.au/ _______________________________________________ Devel mailing list [email protected] http://lists.laptop.org/listinfo/devel
