--- On Sat, 7/21/12, Richard A. Smith <[email protected]> wrote: > > Yes and I'll continue to say it as long as you continue to > do things > that are invalid and will produce nonsensical results. > I've told you a > few times that when you run commands like bg-acr! that you > are modifying > important values outside of the EC and that until you do a > full > discharge/recharge cycle normal reporting won't yield valid > results. > I'm sorry but I did not run any bg-acr! commands except the one you suggested. The only command that I run outside your suggestions is bg-acr@ .bg-acr with no batman.fth/batman-start first, which certainly can not account for the erratic behavior.
You are certainly free to disregard whatever I say/describe, but can not justify it by "inappropriate commands", because they were not any. All the commands issued are described precisely. I keep saying that the battery EC might have a problem and you just dismiss all the indications (like a full battery reporting as empty) including even the fact that EC reports the battery is asleep while the discharge data show that is not. Oh well, I do not think that one battery in a couple of millions worths all this trouble. Have a good trip. _______________________________________________ Devel mailing list [email protected] http://lists.laptop.org/listinfo/devel
