On Sun, Aug 03, 2014 at 05:33:20PM -0700, Sameer Verma wrote: > So, do we now have any OLPC-signed Sugar 102 images or are they > still unsigned?
Unsigned. What's the use case? Is it that you want quick install, or that you have secured laptops? For quick install: - a small and simple installer on OLPC Wiki: http://wiki.laptop.org/go/Firmware/Storage#How_to_automatically_install_an_unsigned_build or - the 0.102 page on Sugar Labs Wiki refers to a tool used by Australia that can be customised: https://github.com/jmcmullen/olpc-teacher-update For secured laptops: - get them unsecured, http://wiki.laptop.org/go/Collection_stick or - make a local deployment key, unlock and insert the key, then sign the Sugar Labs 0.102 build with it. On Sun, Aug 03, 2014 at 09:13:34PM -0400, Walter Bender wrote: > I think James is the one who can sign these days. (Maybe Reuben > too?) Yes, for OLPC I'm the signer, and so can Reuben. I must reproduce a build before I can honestly sign it though. I don't plan to sign or publish a Fedora 18 with Sugar 0.102, as this thread opens with. (I'm more interested in Fedora 20 with Sugar 0.102. I'm struggling with kernel or low userspace system stability with Fedora 20. Every XO-4 that I've tested on shows evidence of cache corruption or a dirty page list writeback pause when using loopback block device. This prevents easy use of olpc-os-builder on XO-4. I'm also stymied by devel@lists.laptop.org being down.) -- James Cameron http://quozl.linux.org.au/ _______________________________________________ Devel mailing list Devel@lists.laptop.org http://lists.laptop.org/listinfo/devel
