On Saturday, April 25, 2015 10:36:49 PM Peter Robinson wrote: > On Sat, Apr 25, 2015 at 5:10 AM, Samuel Greenfeld <sam...@greenfeld.org> wrote: > > At James' suggestion I looked a bit into a Fedora 22 beta build. I have > > found the following problems so far getting the RPM dependencies worked > > out: > > > > olpc-library needs to depend on python-jinja2, not python-jinja. The > > olpc-library RPM also was removed from Fedora, perhaps due to lack of > > changes & abandonment. > > Likely, I didn't even know it existed. > > > totem-mozplugin no longer exists and was intentionally removed. Given > > Firefox supports various media codecs internally this might not be a > > problem for it (apart for vmeta?); but I don't know what webkit-based > > Browse uses for media players. > > Gstreamer based as well so I don't see any major issue there except if > vmeta doesn't support gstreamer 1.0 > > > xorg-x11-drv-keyboard and -mouse have been replaced by > > xorg-x11-drv-libinput. See > > https://fedoraproject.org/wiki/Changes/LibinputForXorg > > Works fine on SoaS, although I think there might be a need to migrate > Control Panel bits, I did send an email about it some time ago to > devel@ > > > 14.1.0 has custom F20 systemd binaries, but I am having trouble finding > > information as to why. If they have relevant changes they need to be > > ported to F22 if not already present because using the F20 systemd > > binaries breaks all sorts of library dependencies. > > The reason is due to changes in firmware loading changes in the kernel > and the fact the XO kernels haven't been rebased to something more > modern than 3.0+ > > > Patches have been written for the first three that I could submit. > > > > We need to come up with a clear direction as to what volunteers and/or > > OLPC > > want & would actually use for updated XO builds. I only have the time to > > focus on one set of images. > > I can help on anything needed that's in Fedora in terms of adding > patches there so you don't need to fork but similarly I don't have > much time.
with Fedora.NEXT we may be able to look at making OLPC builds be an official part of Fedora, tirckiest bit I think would be the kernel. Long term I think it would be good for both OLPC and Fedora for this to happen. Dennis
signature.asc
Description: This is a digitally signed message part.
_______________________________________________ Devel mailing list Devel@lists.laptop.org http://lists.laptop.org/listinfo/devel
