On 4/19/24 9:49 AM, Marc Hartmayer wrote:
Even if `priv->udev_monitor` was never initialized, the mdevctlLock, udevThread
were. Therefore let's match the order of releasing the resources the order of
allocating the resources in `nodeStateInitialize`.

In addition, use `g_steal_pointer` in `g_list_free_full`.

Signed-off-by: Marc Hartmayer <mhart...@linux.ibm.com>
---
  src/node_device/node_device_udev.c | 18 +++++++++---------
  1 file changed, 9 insertions(+), 9 deletions(-)

diff --git a/src/node_device/node_device_udev.c 
b/src/node_device/node_device_udev.c
index 7f233652b461..1638a7196709 100644
--- a/src/node_device/node_device_udev.c
+++ b/src/node_device/node_device_udev.c
@@ -88,6 +88,10 @@ udevEventDataDispose(void *obj)
g_clear_pointer(&priv->initThread, g_free); + VIR_WITH_MUTEX_LOCK_GUARD(&priv->mdevctlLock) {
+        g_list_free_full(g_steal_pointer(&priv->mdevctlMonitors), 
g_object_unref);
+    }
+
      if (priv->watch != -1)
          virEventRemoveHandle(priv->watch);
@@ -96,16 +100,12 @@ udevEventDataDispose(void *obj) g_clear_pointer(&priv->udevThread, g_free); - if (!priv->udev_monitor)
-        return;
-
-    udev = udev_monitor_get_udev(priv->udev_monitor);
-    udev_monitor_unref(priv->udev_monitor);
-    udev_unref(udev);
-
-    VIR_WITH_MUTEX_LOCK_GUARD(&priv->mdevctlLock) {
-        g_list_free_full(priv->mdevctlMonitors, g_object_unref);
+    if (priv->udev_monitor) {
+        udev = udev_monitor_get_udev(priv->udev_monitor);
+        udev_monitor_unref(priv->udev_monitor);
+        udev_unref(udev);
      }
+
      virMutexDestroy(&priv->mdevctlLock);
virCondDestroy(&priv->udevThreadCond);


Reviewed-by: Jonathon Jongsma <jjong...@redhat.com>
_______________________________________________
Devel mailing list -- devel@lists.libvirt.org
To unsubscribe send an email to devel-le...@lists.libvirt.org

Reply via email to