In normal practice a virFirewallCmd should never have 0 args by the
time it gets to the Apply stage, but at some time while debugging one
of the other patches in this series, exactly that happened (due to a
bug that was since squashed), and having a check for it helped
debugging, so let's permanently check for it.

Signed-off-by: Laine Stump <la...@redhat.com>
Reviewed-by: Daniel P. Berrangé <berra...@redhat.com>
---
 src/util/virfirewall.c | 6 ++++++
 1 file changed, 6 insertions(+)

diff --git a/src/util/virfirewall.c b/src/util/virfirewall.c
index 902cb8e445..1897a66070 100644
--- a/src/util/virfirewall.c
+++ b/src/util/virfirewall.c
@@ -538,6 +538,12 @@ virFirewallApplyCmd(virFirewall *firewall,
     if (fwCmd->ignoreErrors)
         ignoreErrors = fwCmd->ignoreErrors;
 
+    if (fwCmd->argsLen == 0) {
+        virReportError(VIR_ERR_INTERNAL_ERROR, "%s",
+                       _("Can't apply empty firewall command"));
+        return -1;
+    }
+
     if (virFirewallApplyCmdDirect(fwCmd, ignoreErrors, &output) < 0)
         return -1;
 
-- 
2.44.0
_______________________________________________
Devel mailing list -- devel@lists.libvirt.org
To unsubscribe send an email to devel-le...@lists.libvirt.org

Reply via email to