Hi Steve, I apologize for the slow response. Steve Sistare <steven.sist...@oracle.com> writes:
> Using qom-list and qom-get to get all the nodes and property values in a > QOM tree can take multiple seconds because it requires 1000's of individual > QOM requests. Some managers fetch the entire tree or a large subset > of it when starting a new VM, and this cost is a substantial fraction of > start up time. "Some managers"... could you name one? > To reduce this cost, consider QAPI calls that fetch more information in > each call: > * qom-list-get: given a path, return a list of properties and values. > * qom-list-getv: given a list of paths, return a list of properties and > values for each path. > * qom-tree-get: given a path, return all descendant nodes rooted at that > path, with properties and values for each. Libvirt developers, would you be interested in any of these? > In all cases, a returned property is represented by ObjectPropertyValue, > with fields name, type, value, and error. If an error occurs when reading > a value, the value field is omitted, and the error message is returned in the > the error field. Thus an error for one property will not cause a bulk fetch > operation to fail. Returning errors this way is highly unusual. Observation; I'm not rejecting this out of hand. Can you elaborate a bit on why it's useful? > To evaluate each method, I modified scripts/qmp/qom-tree to use the method, > verified all methods produce the same output, and timed each using: > > qemu-system-x86_64 -display none \ > -chardev socket,id=monitor0,path=/tmp/vm1.sock,server=on,wait=off \ > -mon monitor0,mode=control & > > time qom-tree -s /tmp/vm1.sock > /dev/null Cool! > I only measured once per method, but the variation is low after a warm up run. > The 'real - user - sys' column is a proxy for QEMU CPU time. > > method real(s) user(s) sys(s) (real - user - sys)(s) > qom-list / qom-get 2.048 0.932 0.057 1.059 > qom-list-get 0.402 0.230 0.029 0.143 > qom-list-getv 0.200 0.132 0.015 0.053 > qom-tree-get 0.143 0.123 0.012 0.008 > > qom-tree-get is the clear winner, reducing elapsed time by a factor of 14X, > and reducing QEMU CPU time by 132X. > > qom-list-getv is slower when fetching the entire tree, but can beat > qom-tree-get when only a subset of the tree needs to be fetched (not shown). > > qom-list-get is shown for comparison only, and is not included in this series. If we have qom-list-getv, then qom-list-get is not worth having.
