From: Michal Privoznik <mpriv...@redhat.com>

Fedora 40 is now officially at end of life [1]. The minimal
version we aim to support upstream is thus Fedora 41. Reflect
this in the spec file.

1: 
https://lists.fedoraproject.org/archives/list/devel-annou...@lists.fedoraproject.org/thread/XCUBN7NR7LXFFSA3IJDRTGHC7K4CXARV/

Signed-off-by: Michal Privoznik <mpriv...@redhat.com>
---
 libvirt.spec.in | 6 +++---
 1 file changed, 3 insertions(+), 3 deletions(-)

diff --git a/libvirt.spec.in b/libvirt.spec.in
index 59e144ce4b..fd1e2d28c0 100644
--- a/libvirt.spec.in
+++ b/libvirt.spec.in
@@ -4,7 +4,7 @@
 # that's still supported by the vendor. It may work on other distros
 # or versions, but no effort will be made to ensure that going forward.
 %define min_rhel 9
-%define min_fedora 37
+%define min_fedora 41
 
 %define arches_qemu_kvm         %{ix86} x86_64 %{power64} %{arm} aarch64 s390x 
riscv64
 %if 0%{?rhel}
@@ -190,7 +190,7 @@
         #
         # TODO: add RHEL 9 once a minor release that contains the necessary 
SELinux
         #       bits exists (we only support the most recent minor release)
-        %if 0%{?fedora} >= 40
+        %if 0%{?fedora}
             %define with_nbdkit_config_default 
0%{!?_without_nbdkit_config_default:1}
         %endif
     %endif
@@ -207,7 +207,7 @@
 
 # Prefer nftables for future OS releases but keep using iptables
 # for existing ones
-%if 0%{?rhel} >= 10 || 0%{?fedora} >= 41
+%if 0%{?rhel} >= 10 || 0%{?fedora}
     %define prefer_nftables 1
     %define firewall_backend_priority nftables,iptables
 %else
-- 
2.49.0

Reply via email to