On Tue, May 20, 2025 at 17:28:26 +0900, Kazuhiro Abe wrote:
> From: Akio Kakuno <fj333...@fujitsu.com>
>
> - This test was added to check qemu capabilities for Arm
> CCA support.
IF
> This test was created using the method described in the
> documentation.
>
> Signed-off-by: Kazuhiro Abe <fj107...@aa.jp.fujitsu.com>
> ---
> .../caps_9.1.0_aarch64.replies | 36222 ++++++++++++++++
> .../caps_9.1.0_aarch64.xml | 530 +
> 2 files changed, 36752 insertions(+)
> create mode 100644 tests/qemucapabilitiesdata/caps_9.1.0_aarch64.replies
> create mode 100644 tests/qemucapabilitiesdata/caps_9.1.0_aarch64.xml
Note that I'll be commenting only on the capability testing related
matter, not the rest of the series.
> diff --git a/tests/qemucapabilitiesdata/caps_9.1.0_aarch64.replies
> b/tests/qemucapabilitiesdata/caps_9.1.0_aarch64.replies
> new file mode 100644
> index 0000000000..906a21f0c6
> --- /dev/null
> +++ b/tests/qemucapabilitiesdata/caps_9.1.0_aarch64.replies
> @@ -0,0 +1,36222 @@
> +{
> + "execute": "qmp_capabilities",
> + "id": "libvirt-1"
> +}
> +
> +{
> + "return": {},
> + "id": "libvirt-1"
> +}
> +
> +{
> + "execute": "query-version",
> + "id": "libvirt-2"
> +}
> +
> +{
> + "return": {
> + "qemu": {
> + "micro": 91,
> + "minor": 1,
> + "major": 9
This is from 9.2.0-rc1. So firstly the file is named wrong, because it
was supposed to be 'caps_9.2.0_aarch64.replies' instead.
Also except for the currently developed release we require that the
.replies files are generated from the final release versions and not the
RCs or any other non-final code.
The libvirt tree already has qemu caps for 9.2.0 and 10.0.0 for aarch64.
What makes these special?
If there's a reason to have specific capabilities please add a 'variant'
per tests/qemucapabilitiesdata/README.rst
