Hello Jiri,

Thanks for the feedback,

On Mon, Jun 2, 2025 at 9:30 AM Jiri Denemark <jdene...@redhat.com> wrote:

> On Mon, Jun 02, 2025 at 01:19:29 +0200, Hector Cao wrote:
> > Several Intel CPU models with TSX technology (HLE & RTM features) are
> > affected by the vulnerability TAA[1]. One of the mitigation methods
> > for TAA is to disable TSX support on the host system. For that purpose,
> > in 2021, Intel published a microcode update to disable TSX. Linux kernel
> > also disables TSX globally by default. Even though TSX can be activated
> via
> > the kernel command line (tsx=on), many Linux distributions stick with
> > this default behavior and have TSX disabled. This makes existing CPU
> > models that have HLE and RTM enabled not correctly detected by
> > libvirt.
>
> Can you describe the issue in more details? Especially where libvirt
> incorrectly detects CPU models because of this?
>
>
On my platform (Granite Rapids CPU) with TSX disabled by default in the
kernel
The TSX features rtm and hle are missing, per consequence, `virsh
capabilities` detects the CPU as
Icelake-Server-noTSX model.


> > This commit adds 2 remaining -noTSX models:
> > - SapphireRapids-noTSX
> > - GraniteRapids-noTSX
>
> QEMU switched away from adding suffixes to CPU models and just adds a
> new version for a CPU model in case it needs to be updated. There's no
> point adding these models to libvirt. Any CPU model that would only
> exist in libvirt would not be directly usable anyway and would have to
> be translated to another CPU model.
>

I would be grateful if you can provide me some background on what is the
criteria to add a
new version to an existing model. For the case of Intel, how do we know
that we need to
add a new version to the CPU model ?

Beyond the naming issue (version vs suffix), I understand that we stopped
doing what we did for older CPU models
like this commit for Icelake, do I understand it correctly ?

i386: Add -noTSX aliases for hle=off, rtm=off CPU models
https://github.com/qemu/qemu/commit/02fa60d10137ed2ef17534718d7467e0d2170142

Do you think that adding a new version for Sapphire and Granite Rapids CPU
models both in QEMU
and libvirt would be something that makes sense to tackle this issue ?


> Jirka
>
>

-- 
Hector CAO
Software Engineer – Partner Engineering Team
hector....@canonical.com
https://launc <https://launchpad.net/~hectorcao>hpad.net/~hectorcao
<https://launchpad.net/~hectorcao>

<https://launchpad.net/~hectorcao>

Reply via email to