>-----Original Message-----
>From: Daniel P. Berrangé <berra...@redhat.com>
>Subject: Re: [PATCH v3 00/21] LIBVIRT: X86: TDX support
>
>On Wed, Jul 09, 2025 at 08:55:48AM +0000, Duan, Zhenzhong wrote:
>>
>>
>> >-----Original Message-----
>> >From: Daniel P. Berrangé <berra...@redhat.com>
>> >Subject: Re: [PATCH v3 00/21] LIBVIRT: X86: TDX support
>> >
>> >On Mon, Jun 30, 2025 at 02:17:11PM +0800, Zhenzhong Duan wrote:
>> >> Hi,
>> >>
>> >> This series brings libvirt the x86 TDX support.
>> >>
>> >> * What's TDX?
>> >> TDX stands for Trust Domain Extensions which isolates VMs from
>> >> the virtual-machine manager (VMM)/hypervisor and any other software
>on
>> >> the platform.
>> >>
>> >> This patchset extends libvirt to support TDX, with which one can start a
>TDX
>> >> guest from high level rather than running qemu directly.
>> >>
>> >> * Misc
>> >> As QEMU use a software emulated way to reset guest which isn't
>supported
>> >by TDX
>> >> guest for security reason. We simulate reboot for TDX guest by kill and
>> >create a
>> >> new one in FakeReboot framework.
>> >>
>> >> Complete code can be found at [1].
>> >>
>> >> * Test
>> >> Tested with upstream qemu v10.0.0-1724-gf9a3def17b
>> >> shutdown/reboot/reset with virsh
>> >> shutdown/reboot trigger in guest
>> >> shutdown with on_poweroff=destroy/restart
>> >> reboot with on_reboot=destroy/restart
>> >
>> >FYI when I have a guest crash libvirt logs
>> >
>> >  error : qemuMonitorJSONGuestPanicExtractInfo:638 : internal error:
>> >unknown panic info type 'tdx'
>> >
>> >this is a new type of panic data structure from upstream QEMU
>> >that libvirt needs to handle in some way
>>
>> Oh yes, thanks, will add processing on libvirt side.
>
>I think it'll be useful to get the crash "message" string into the
>per-VM logfile at /var/log/libvirt/qemu/$GUEST.log

OK. I will add TDX part in qemuMonitorJSONGuestPanicExtractInfo(),
then qemuProcessGuestPanicEventInfo() will be called to write to qemu log file.
Please fix me if I understand wrong.

>
>I wasted alot of time trying to understand why my guest was panicking
>until realizing I had mistakenly enabled SEPT #VE. The 'message' string
>in the panic event would have told me that immediately, but it was not
>visible, so I think its important to expose this msg in the logs out of
>the box.

Sure.

Thanks
Zhenzhong

Reply via email to